26-04-2006, 09:12 PM
Not sure how to word this (are we safe here?) but just wondering.
I have always thought of GF as the polar opposite to compassionate sensitive parenting. I read something yesterday that suggested that the anti GF brigade have basically got it wrong and *actually* her books do not condone the practices that people on the AP side of the fence abhor but rather that she has been turned into a Hate figure.
Now I confess that I have never read TCLBB, although I remember flicking through it in a bookshop once and seeing some 'dubious' info on bf. How scientific is the evidence against GF's stuff? Maybe I should read it...
Please delete this if it's a problem, don't want to get anyone into trouble.
I have always thought of GF as the polar opposite to compassionate sensitive parenting. I read something yesterday that suggested that the anti GF brigade have basically got it wrong and *actually* her books do not condone the practices that people on the AP side of the fence abhor but rather that she has been turned into a Hate figure.
Now I confess that I have never read TCLBB, although I remember flicking through it in a bookshop once and seeing some 'dubious' info on bf. How scientific is the evidence against GF's stuff? Maybe I should read it...
Please delete this if it's a problem, don't want to get anyone into trouble.
